Oh
 man, just... no. First of all, this 
"news" was almost exclusively reported by fringe clickbait media outlets
 - such as redice. There's a reason for that: the 
actual news in Sweden is that the government simply decided not to 
enforce the compulsory vaccination of its citizens, on the grounds that 
it conflicted with pre-existing constitutional rights. There's no "ban."
 The mandate to vaccinate still exists in law, because it's still 
totally sensible; they just aren't enforcing it. It's very likely that 
the language will be rewritten in the coming years to implement sensible
 penalties for abstainers, because abstainers are ignorant, and because 
perpetuating ignorance about critical social healthcare tends to lead to
 a lot of people becoming unhealthy and/or dying for absolutely no good 
reason. Not nearly as sensational when you put it like that. There was 
no citing of health concerns, etc., only acknowledgement that side 
effects to vaccines exist and that that their citizens should have the 
option of over-reacting to them because of something false they saw on 
Facebook. (They're progressive like that). That particular blatant 
falsehood can be chocked up to "creative embellishment" by the 
apparently exclusively non-journalistic entities that came out of the 
woodwork to "report" it - along with other examples of comic 
anti-brilliance, such as citing "sodium chloride" (aka COMMON SALT) as a 
"toxic, unhealthy chemical" additive.
The entire theoretical purpose of any society is to mandate sensible minor compromises for the objectively greater benefit of the majority. That aforementioned 
free—useful—education to which Swedes have access is also an important 
contextual omission from the headlines and stories circulating. History, science, and 
common sense are actually taught in schools there. So, while they may 
now officially not be legally required to do so, I strongly suspect 
they're generally extremely likely to continue to vaccinate their 
children... ya know, so their children can continue to NOT die from/be-maimed-by/end-up-horribly-disfigured-by some truly fucking awful, 
completely preventable diseases. Here in the states, on the other hand, 
we're "free" to let measles and mumps outbreaks run rampant thanks in no
 small part to a not nearly small-enough minority of anti-vaxxers - who 
are still numerous enough to put a significant dent in herd immunity, 
putting not only their own kids at risk, but everyone else's, too. 
There
 should be fewer/better additives developed to stabilize and preserve 
vaccines, sure - but even the oldest, most toxic vaccine to ever see widespread use would
still do far less damage even in its outlying worse-cases than would a minute or two of inhaling secondhand cigarette smoke. This
 entire issue is sensationalist bullshit. Nobody is entitled to an 
unchallenged public opinion when said opinion contradicts fact, reason, and even common-fucking-sense!
There, I'm done. A tall glass of reason with a thick tmesis sandwich is a balm in this age of insanity.